tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1840142964032812998.post7439146066437731240..comments2023-04-04T00:43:11.346-07:00Comments on The WrestlingNerd: WrestlingNerd Presents: WWE Extreme Rules 2013 ReviewThe WrestlingNerdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17184501914778344152noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1840142964032812998.post-71659555143487327442013-05-26T03:17:20.840-07:002013-05-26T03:17:20.840-07:00Dude you sound like a mark these days.... Dude you sound like a mark these days.... Paul Heyman guy.noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1840142964032812998.post-6349640517328368752013-05-21T20:35:08.756-07:002013-05-21T20:35:08.756-07:00Now why would Del Rio win if they saw that the hic...Now why would Del Rio win if they saw that the hick through a towel?! Swagger didn't quit (at that point), so he shouldn't automatically lose.<br />Either:<br />1. Ref comes from the back and says that Coulter threw the towel and he restarts the match.<br />or 2. They go to the "instant replay" to confirm that Coulter threw it.<br /><br />Option 2 makes sense if you believe (like I do) that WWE was making fun of the sports culture in general; specifically baseball, and their TERRIBLE use of replay.<br /><br />WWE has made fun of the way actual sports does things in the past, so why should Sunday night be any different?Neohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08524263132498453188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1840142964032812998.post-17647113826885708032013-05-21T11:49:39.272-07:002013-05-21T11:49:39.272-07:00sorry, i meant to say swagger in line 3... you get...sorry, i meant to say swagger in line 3... you get what i mean.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1840142964032812998.post-27673697067533167832013-05-21T11:47:58.361-07:002013-05-21T11:47:58.361-07:00the swagger finish was the worst thing all year.
...the swagger finish was the worst thing all year. <br />either:<br />del rio wins.<br />OR:<br />they see that coulter threw it, and thus, del rio wins because coulter threw the towel!<br />WTF!??! how did they go the ONLY illogical way with this??<br />not to mention they have to justify why they dont do instant replays in every match now (which would make heels basically lose 100% of matches because wwe has no strong heels), but of course the 'fanbase' wont care about logic in their wrestling show. <br />at least in tna there is still logic where a guy goes from vice president to threatened murdervictim after losing one match, after the whole gang lost matches for months after months- <br />now im depressed... maybe i should start watching something else...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1840142964032812998.post-27826459606012358752013-05-20T21:52:13.461-07:002013-05-20T21:52:13.461-07:00I would say Wal-Mart.I would say Wal-Mart.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com